01
What changed
In the week following large provider and UI work, we focused on review and cleanup. We reduced the risks introduced by the prior volume of changes through reviews of security and configuration assumptions and by refactoring LLM integration code.
- Reviewed security and configuration assumptions.
- Refactored LLM integration/interface code.
- Stabilized previous work rather than expanding features.
02
How this week was reconstructed
No matching local Claude Code project transcript was recovered for this period. This entry therefore describes only what the Git history can prove.
We audited the available Claude Code main sessions, their proven child lineages, and the repository history. Session notes explain intent and investigation; Git remains the authority for code that actually landed.
03
Team identity and project roles
OpenMake Team is the community identity; openmake_llm is the software project; OpenMake is the product name. Non-developer maker riskpw leads openmake_llm through vibe coding, and professional developer rocky supports its development.
证据来源
OpenMake